When Amanda first posted about us (mainly me) being concerned with our lack-luster number of RSS subscribers – ie: less than 5,000 – It came across as a “why do our numbers suck” post, and that’s a fine question for us to be asking, our numbers do need improving just in a general sense.

Even if our blog has subscribers in the thousands, we have nothing in place right now to make the best use of that readership. And that, out of everything, is what I stress about the most. Mainly because it’s a problem I don’t have the technical skills to solve on my own, but also because for every week that goes by, on editing and writing, it’s another week we have make-up for in the future.
I have ideas on what tools I think we need, and I’ve been searching, within my little social circle, for someone qualified to help build them. And I’m interested in building tools that would help every filmmaker, and even beyond that, tools that could easily be used for projects of any kind.

Before I talk about the two tools I’ve been thinking about the most, I wanted to stress that my main motivation behind worrying about this at all: is planning for the worst (or to be realistic, planning for the most likely). It’s highly unlikely that For Thousands of Miles will blow people away at Sundance. Hell, it’s unlikely it will even get into Sundance. It’s even more unlikely that the film will be picked up by any distribution house. It’s even more unlikely beyond that, that even if we got an offer for distribution we would take it. Amanda and I have come way too far with this film to sell it away for a next-to-nothing first-time-filmmakers compensation, loose all our control of the film, have them make a half-assed attempt at a theatrical run, and be stuck in a shitty DVD-release contract.
So, I want to plan on distributing this film ourselves. I don’t want to spend a great deal of energy and time cutting For Thousands of Miles, and then, when it’s complete, have it sit on a shelf and collect dust because we didn’t have a plan B in place. It is time for Amanda and I to start putting into motion the audience now that will want to see the film later. So we can hit the ground running when it’s ready to be seen.

I’m working on a map that has “phases” to it, all states begin at phase 1, all states have a low, realistic goal of needed request. Once a state reaches that first goal, let’s say California needs 100 people to complete the first phase, it moves onto phase 2 and Amanda and I are required to dump more resources there with the people interested in the film. Using the first 100 request as a stepping-stone, asking those people to see if their friends would like to request the film, and so on. Mailing out flyers and buttons to those people. Branching out in baby-steps. I have the map designed, and the state-shaped-links are all entered into a basic template… but I’m having issues building a smart request tool around it.
Which brings me to the second tool I’ve been thinking about. Amanda and I had lunch the other afternoon with the lovely Jessica Stover, from Artemis Eternal, near the end of our lunch, we started talking about Twitter. Jessica said that Twitter seems to be nearing the point where a filmmaker could almost drive their entire movement with Twitter alone. Which got me thinking about Facebook Connect, which then got me thinking about Twitter Connect (which doesn’t exist… yet).

Giving you options of having people’s activity on your map, or community, be broadcast automatically to their stream (if they want it to).

Online tools are always presenting themselves, and people are always looking for new ways to take those tools and expand on them. Indie filmmakers stand to gain so much by re-packaging those tools to best fit their project. Do you have a project of your own? How are you planning for the future?

